Lucy Henry Harrison to Stan Henkels

Name/Title

Lucy Henry Harrison to Stan Henkels

Entry/Object ID

04.13.12

Description

A handwritten letter on three pages of plain stationery. From Lucy Henry Harrison to Stan V. Henkels. Dated August 6, 1910. Mrs. Harrison continues to dispute with Henkels over the value of the collection and defends the provenance of the Sully portrait.

Transcription

Transcription

Brookneal, Campbell Co. Virginia (Aug. 6/1910) Stan. V. Henkels, My Dear Sir: I have your letter of August 3rd but you failed to enclose the itemized receipt for the papers and relics which I have sent you. You also failed to explain why you assured me that you thought you could easily get $15,000 for the collection and then before ever seeing it, but knowing it was on its way to you, began to put a lower price upon it until you have reduced it to less than half of $15,000. In my first letter to you I told you that I preferred its being sold privately and that my price was $15,000. Had you not written me that you were confident of getting my price I would not have sent it to you. I wish you had been more candid with me from the first and had not mislead [sic] me with unnecessary expense. I do not blame you for the valuation you give to the collection if you are sincere, but I blame you very much for writing me so differently in the beginning. Indeed I do not understand your inconsistencies at all. In you letter of July 13th you write—“The Lee letter about the Declaration lacks the last page with signature, “complete thing would have been worth $600 or $700.” In your letter of Aug. 3rd you say—“one letter in particular which I appraised at $1500.00 was the R. H. Lee letter about the Declaration, this letter lacks the last page or two with signature which would reduce its value to $30 or $40.” How do I reconcile these two statements? If it is true that Sully put a false portrait upon Mr. Wirt and any proof is forthcoming, I certainly will not refuse to believe it but you must remember that you will have to prove that Mrs. Henry was party to the fraud when she said that a miniature had been painted by a french [sic] artist in 1791 and that she and her son John aided Mr. Sully in carrying out his deciption [sic] when they said that this miniature was sent to him to paint the portrait from. These are very serious charges and I shall expect them to be proved or your statement about the portrait retracted. I do not agree with you as to the value of the portrait not being injured by such a charge. It is not only injured but absolutely distroyed [sic] as a picture of Patrick Henry. I wish your data on this subject sent me as soon as you can collect it. My secretary will be in Phila. In the near future and will call upon you. Very truly yours Mrs. M. B. Harrison Per. E. H. K. Aug 6th, 1910

Language

English

Dimensions

Width

5-3/4 in

Length

8-1/2 in

Dimension Notes

Details: 9-3/4 inches x 5-3/4 inches

Provenance

Notes

This letter belongs to a collection of correspondence primarily from Lucy Gray Henry Harrison (1857–1944) to Stanislaus “Stan” Vincent Henkels (1854–1926) concerning a proposed sale of Patrick Henry family heirlooms in 1910. Mrs. Harrison was Patrick Henry's great-granddaughter and the last Henry descendant to own and live at Red Hill. She grew up in Richmond, Virginia, and moved to Duluth, Minnesota, after marrying real estate millionaire Matthew Bland Harrison (1853–1892) in 1886. In 1905, she inherited Red Hill and moved onto the property, where she lived along with her sister, Elizabeth Watkins Henry Lyons (1855–1920), and her assistant, Elizabeth H. Kerper (1890–1964). Mrs. Harrison inherited many of the family heirlooms that had belonged to Patrick Henry and many of his papers. In 1910, on the advice of Philadelphia neurologist and writer Dr. Weir Mitchell (1829–1914), she contacted Stan V. Henkels about a possible private sale or public auction of some of these pieces. Mr. Henkels was an antique dealer in Philadelphia well-known for his auctions and private sales to collectors. In 1890 and 1891, he cataloged two sales of George Washington-related documents and artifacts while he worked as chief auctioneer for the company Thomas Birch’s Sons. The correspondence from Mrs. Harrison to Mr. Henkels details their business negotiations from May 1910 leading up to the sale of the items in Philadelphia on December 20, 1910. It also includes letters concerning a settling of accounts between them up through February 1911. The Henry heirlooms Mrs. Harrison sent to auction included a collection of Henry’s letters and other documents. Among these were several letters between Henry and Virginia politician Richard Henry Lee (1732–1794) about various issues and events during the Revolution. Lee’s letter to Henry of April 20, 1776, advocates for a Declaration of Independence from Great Britain two and a half months before the signing of that document. This letter was sold at the auction for $40. Thomas Sully’s (1783–1872) portrait of Patrick Henry is an oil painting on canvas commissioned in 1815 by Henry’s first biographer, William Wirt (1772–1834). An engraving of the portrait was featured on the frontispiece of Wirt’s 1817 biography, “Sketches of the Life & Character of Patrick Henry.” Sully based the portrait on one of the few images of Henry painted from life: a miniature created, not by a French artist in 1791, as Mrs. Harrison believed, but in 1795 by Sully’s half-brother, Lawrence Sully (1769–1804). Thomas Sully’s portrait of Henry was given by Wirt to Henry’s youngest son, John (1796–1868), who passed the portrait on to his son William Wirt Henry (1831–1900), who loaned it to the Virginia State Library in Richmond from 1873 to 1884 before he passed it on to his daughter, Lucy Harrison. In 1902, Mrs. Harrison loaned the portrait again to the Virginia State Library but reclaimed it in 1910 to sell it at Mr. Henkels’ auction, where it was purchased by Charles Hamilton (1847–1930) for $4,000. The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation later purchased the portrait from the Hamilton family and currently has it in its collection. Mr. Henkels’ doubt about the Sully portrait’s authenticity may be related to an unfounded claim published in 1909 in “The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography” that the Lawrence Sully miniature, which served as Thomas Sully’s inspiration, was not painted from life. The magazine’s editor, Charles Henry Hart (1847–1918), invalidated this claim before the December 1910 auction when he identified the miniature as a life portrait. Lawrence Sully’s miniature of Henry was painted from life in 1795. The miniature passed through the family of Patrick Henry’s older half-brother, John Syme Jr. (1727–?), and in 1910, was owned by Syme’s great-grandson, John Syme Fleming Jr. (1842–1922). Mr. Fleming sent it to auction at the same 1910 sale that Mrs. Harrison sent her Henry heirlooms to. It was sold at auction for $660 to Gilbert Sunderland Parker (1861–1921), the curator of paintings at the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts. At some point, it passed into the possession of Herbert Lee Pratt (1871–1945), who left it to Amherst College in 1945. Mrs. Harrison’s secretary was Elizabeth H. Kerper, a Pennsylvania native who lived with Mrs. Harrison at Red Hill for three decades. The Patrick Henry Memorial Foundation purchased this letter from an online seller in May 2004 as part of the collection of correspondence.