Letter for Tax Exemption from Hunt, Hill & Betts Nov 7, 1952

Letter for Tax Exemption from Hunt, Hill & Betts Nov 7, 1952

Letter for Tax Exemption from Hunt, Hill & Betts Nov 7, 1952

Name/Title

Letter for Tax Exemption from Hunt, Hill & Betts Nov 7, 1952

Entry/Object ID

001702

Tags

E Myron Bull, Robert McLeod Jackson

Scope and Content

Document Transcription: mn-1551 HUNT, HILL & BETTS COUNSELLORS AT LAW-PROCTORS IN ADMIRALTY EQUITABLE BUILDING 120 BROADWAY NEW YORK 5, N. Y. November 7, 1952. E. Myron Bull, Esq. 115 Broad Street New York 4, N. Y. In re tax exemption of Bull Family Association Dear Myron: I have only now been able to go further into the above matter. The Exemption Application blank which I sent you sometime ago applies to corporations exempted from income tax under Section 101(6) of the Internal Revenue Code which could apply to our Association only if it were considered as a literary or educational organization, and it seems that under a comparatively recent requirement of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, organizations exempt under Section 101(6) are required to fill out and file a form known as 990-A which is quite a complicated form, of which I enclose a copy herewith. There is another ground of exemption provided by Section 101(9) cover- ing clubs organized and operated for pleasure, recreation and other non-profitable purposes. It seems to me that our Association might more readily come within Section 101(9) than 101(6). I have filled out and enclose to you herewith a copy of Exemption Application under Section 101(9), but I have not attached the statement required by Question 15 with regard to the amounts received for sales of property and disposition of the proceeds. A number of separate sales of real estate were made in past years and it would take a certain amount of study to prepare this statement. Nor have I prepared the statement of receipts and expenditures required by Question 17, but this statement could be more easily prepared. I am inclined to apply for exemption under 101(9), and if we did so we could be guided by the reply to our application, which would come from Washington, as to our next step. If you would care to keep them, you may retain the forms enclosed. Otherwise they can be sent back to me. With regard to the roof of the east side of the barn, I regret to report that Charles McMann, the carpenter on whom I relied, has been taken seriously ill and the doctors give no hope of his recovery. I have asked another carpenter for an estimate. This other man charges $16 a day as against McMann's $14. Please let me have your views. Sincerely yours, Bob. RMJ/ba